Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2004 7:30 am Post subject: [Asterisk-bsd] status of TDM400 FXS modules
I have a customer who wants to be able to use Sayson ADSI phones at his
premises, therefore I would need to use FXS modules in the TDM400 card (I know
of no other method of accomplishing this). I noticed that in the port revision
log for the zaptel-bsd driver, it says that FXS compiles but has never been
tested.. does anyone have any experience using these yet? Is it a go or no
go?
--
Jason T. Nelson <jtn@jtn.cx> http://www.jtn.cx/~jtn/
BOFH Extraordiaire & Sysadmin Ombudsman GPG key 0xFF676C9E
GPG key fingerprint = 6272 5482 EDDD D0A3 FED2 262A FABB 599D FF67 6C9E
disclaimer: My opinions are my own. Don't bother my employer about them.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-bsd/attachments/20040929/ba8d803b/attachment.pgp
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2004 8:41 am Post subject: [Asterisk-bsd] status of TDM400 FXS modules
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:30:26 -0500, Jason T. Nelson <jtn@jtn.cx> wrote:
Quote:
I have a customer who wants to be able to use Sayson ADSI phones at his
premises, therefore I would need to use FXS modules in the TDM400 card (I know
of no other method of accomplishing this).
How about using IAXy ATAs to connect the Sayson phones over the LAN to
your Asterisk server. If I remember correctly this route supports
ADSI.
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:04 am Post subject: [Asterisk-bsd] status of TDM400 FXS modules
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 16:30, Jason T. Nelson wrote:
Quote:
I have a customer who wants to be able to use Sayson ADSI phones at his
premises, therefore I would need to use FXS modules in the TDM400 card (I know
of no other method of accomplishing this). I noticed that in the port revision
log for the zaptel-bsd driver, it says that FXS compiles but has never been
tested.. does anyone have any experience using these yet? Is it a go or no
go?
I am pretty sure the main developer has not got one of these cards. I
have not needed one so I have not tried it yet. The code is in there
straight from the linux version so it has a small chance of working.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum